Following an investigation, the Irish data protection watchdog issued a €225m (£190m) fine – the second-largest in history over GDPR – and ordered WhatsApp to change its policies.
WhatsApp is appealing against the fine, but is amending its policy documents in Europe and the UK to comply.
However, it insists that nothing about its actual service is changing.
“There are no changes to our processes or contractual agreements with users, and users will not be required to agree to anything or to take any action in order to continue using WhatsApp,” the company said, announcing the change.
The new policy takes effect immediately.
In January, WhatsApp users complained about an update to the company’s terms that many believed would result in data being shared with parent company Facebook, which is now called Meta.
Many thought refusing to agree to the new terms and conditions would result in their accounts being blocked.
In reality, very little had changed. However, WhatsApp was forced to delay its changes and spend months fighting the public perception to the contrary.
Writing about the new tweaks required by the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC), WhatsApp directly addressed those kinds of concerns.
“This update does not change how we process, use or share user data with anyone, including Meta, nor does it change how we operate our service,” it wrote.
And “users will not be required to agree to anything new or to take any action in order to keep using WhatsApp”, it added.
The company was also keen to stress that its service is, and continues to be, end-to-end encrypted, meaning messages can only be read by the sender and recipient.
The fine handed to WhatsApp in September was the result of a years-long investigation into whether the social media giant was transparent enough about how it handles user information.
The Irish DPC had originally found against WhatsApp in some areas and not others, and proposed a fine of between €30m-50m.
But after it consulted with other EU nations’ regulators as part of the process, it reassessed the amount.
WhatsApp continues to appeal against the decision, saying it believes that it had always provided the required information to its users.